It appears that this funding has been severely curtailed, which is not inconsistent with the Trump administration's pro-gun stance ( 8).įurther-refined estimates that use panel regression methods for annual data for this entire period, or for just the post-crack period, support the conclusion that RTC laws are associated with increases in violent crime ( 18). Beginning in 2014 under President Obama, the National Institutes of Health provided $11.4 million for gun violence-related projects over the course of 3 years. However, the CDC and other government agencies have continued to support data collection that has been useful in studying violence, including the National Vital Statistics System, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Uniform Crime Reports, the National Violent Death Reporting System, and the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System. The CDC largely ended its gun research as a result of this clear message. The CDC initiated a gun-violence research program in the 1980s, but in 1996, influenced by the pro-gun National Rifle Association, Congress adopted the Dickey Amendment, which banned the use of government research funding to advocate for gun control, and cut the CDC budget by $2.6 million, which happened to be the budget of the gun-violence program. federal funding for research on injuries has lagged behind funding for research on diseases, but, even by comparison with research on injuries from motor vehicle crashes (which cause a similar number of deaths each year), federal funding for gun-violence research is miniscule (7). New findings are providing a sound evidence base for policy-making and, among other contributions, have helped demonstrate efficacy in three important domains of gun policy: add-on sentences for gun use in violent crime, bans on gun possession by those convicted of domestic violence, and restrictions on carrying concealed firearms in public. This good news, often lost in the well-justified complaints about the lack of federal funding, deserves greater recognition. Although the CDC largely withdrew from funding research on gun violence more than 20 years ago (under intense congressional pressure), there are active research programs in medicine, public health, law, and the social sciences under way in universities and think tanks. Fortunately, the flow of high-quality research has increased in recent years. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine ( 4– 6). Given this heavy burden, it is greatly concerning that many aspects of the body of research on gun violence have been deemed inadequate and inconclusive by expert panels of the U.S. Interpersonal gun violence has deleterious effects on economic development and standard of living in heavily impacted neighborhoods ( 3). The gun-murder rate is 25 times as high in the United States as in other high-income nations, and the gun-suicide rate is eight times as high ( 2). Gun violence is a leading cause of death in the United States, where over 36,000 people were killed by gunshot in 2015.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |